Bokonon

|creations|video|portfolio|personal photographs|writing|
Instagram: InfectiousHumanWaste
Some of my friends have fingers. See above.
sanguinesiren:

ROADTRIPPIN MOFUCKAS @lvithnn (Taken with instagram)

Some of my friends have fingers. See above.

sanguinesiren:

ROADTRIPPIN MOFUCKAS @lvithnn (Taken with instagram)

I say that intentionally.
I am not a lesbian. Not bi. Not straight. Not pan. Not gay.
I am queer. Intentionally. I intentionally use this term although others may apply.
Because being queer is political. It is fucking shit up. It is reconstructing broken elements. It is loving multiple sexes and genders and expressions, alone and simultaneously.
When I fuck my partner it is queer. When I am fucked it is queer. When I fuck myself it is queer.
My dress is just as queer as my combat boots.
I am always queer. Intentionally.

lessthanawake:

The Pirate Party fits the political gap
“It’s a fairytale success: two years ago, hardly anyone knew that the Pirate Party even existed; now, all of a sudden, it has won seats in state parliaments in four successive elections, and a new poll puts them at 11% of Germany’s national vote. And that’s despite still not having any clear stand on important issues such as Afghanistan or the euro crisis. The German press is bewildered and horrified by turns. The Pirates are a chaotic bunch, they say, a protest party without a real political agenda. A group of internet addicts, nerds who primarily want to download music and films for free.

Anyone who wants to understand the potential of the Pirate Party must first realise that the internet is more than a technical means to an end and more than a playground for file sharers. The internet is the birthplace and living space of a communication society and therefore the key to the transformation of an era; its far-reaching effects will one day be ranked alongside those of trains, planes and automobiles.
Overcoming barriers is about freedom. This is the point that is clearly so difficult to convey. The Pirates are not an internet party but a party interested in freedom. The internet can be seen as a metaphor for what that means today: freedom through equal rights, freedom through the expression of opinion, freedom through open access to education and knowledge. Freedom through the erosion of hierarchy and authority. And freedom through participation and pluralism.
No other party in the political spectrum right now is dedicated to serving freedom in that sense of the word. The Pirates fill a gap. They are the only German party that treats freedom not just as an idealistic utopia or an economic principle but as a very real tenet of organisation. They want to protect civil rights, to increase every individual’s range to take action, and to give citizens more power to take part in political decisions through electronic means.
This means that they are at odds with the traditional categories of “left” and “right”. In their mistrust of the state and calls for transparency, they are reminiscent of libertarian movements of Anglo-Saxon origin, be they Ayn Rand fanatics or anarchically-minded socialists. At the same time the Pirates call for an “unconditional basic income”, a financial safety net that the state should provide for every citizen. Their preoccupation with the boundaries of intellectual property has even led to some observers calling them communists. The Pirates’ success is due not least to their rejection of conventional political views. But they are not a reaction to the financial crisis – instead, they profit from the fact that an increasing proportion of the electorate feel that the traditional political parties do not speak to them any longer.
Germany now has about 2.5 million self-employed people who work on their own – freelancers and owners of small businesses without any employees. Artists, freelance programmers, tilers and hairdressers number among them. These people are not from the traditional Mittelstand of medium-sized enterprises; many of them have just enough to live on. They are neither entrepreneurs nor industrial workers, so they do not find their political home with either the conservatives or with the social democrats.
As the working world has changed, so too have family structures. There are now all shades of families, from the single working parent to more complex families with more than one father to gay couples with a child.
Different ways of working and different family groupings have given rise to a growing section of society to whom the established parties can offer no answers. The self-employed fall through the health insurance and pension nets, and battle their way every year through a taxation system that is set up either for employees with regular incomes or bigger companies with accounts departments. Lack of childcare is a problem that is as well known as it is unresolved, but flexible working – job-sharing, a four-day week or switching between working in the office and at home – continues to be a distant prospect shrouded in mist.
This is the point at which the generational conflict ignites, a conflict that many assume no longer exists just because parents and children wear the same trainers these days. While younger people are completely redefining the boundaries between work and leisure, job and family, older politicians can only see their desire to live their lives more freely as creating chaos for themselves or as an expression of need.
Traditional political parties’ unwillingness to adjust to the new ways of living and communicating is winning the Pirate Party popularity. It has the potential to become nothing less than Germany’s new liberal social-democratic party. Whether that will happen depends on how far the Pirates succeed in drawing up convincing political demands based on their core principle of freedom.”

lessthanawake:

The Pirate Party fits the political gap

It’s a fairytale success: two years ago, hardly anyone knew that the Pirate Party even existed; now, all of a sudden, it has won seats in state parliaments in four successive elections, and a new poll puts them at 11% of Germany’s national vote. And that’s despite still not having any clear stand on important issues such as Afghanistan or the euro crisis. The German press is bewildered and horrified by turns. The Pirates are a chaotic bunch, they say, a protest party without a real political agenda. A group of internet addicts, nerds who primarily want to download music and films for free.

Anyone who wants to understand the potential of the Pirate Party must first realise that the internet is more than a technical means to an end and more than a playground for file sharers. The internet is the birthplace and living space of a communication society and therefore the key to the transformation of an era; its far-reaching effects will one day be ranked alongside those of trains, planes and automobiles.

Overcoming barriers is about freedom. This is the point that is clearly so difficult to convey. The Pirates are not an internet party but a party interested in freedom. The internet can be seen as a metaphor for what that means today: freedom through equal rights, freedom through the expression of opinion, freedom through open access to education and knowledge. Freedom through the erosion of hierarchy and authority. And freedom through participation and pluralism.

No other party in the political spectrum right now is dedicated to serving freedom in that sense of the word. The Pirates fill a gap. They are the only German party that treats freedom not just as an idealistic utopia or an economic principle but as a very real tenet of organisation. They want to protect civil rights, to increase every individual’s range to take action, and to give citizens more power to take part in political decisions through electronic means.

This means that they are at odds with the traditional categories of “left” and “right”. In their mistrust of the state and calls for transparency, they are reminiscent of libertarian movements of Anglo-Saxon origin, be they Ayn Rand fanatics or anarchically-minded socialists. At the same time the Pirates call for an “unconditional basic income”, a financial safety net that the state should provide for every citizen. Their preoccupation with the boundaries of intellectual property has even led to some observers calling them communists. The Pirates’ success is due not least to their rejection of conventional political views. But they are not a reaction to the financial crisis – instead, they profit from the fact that an increasing proportion of the electorate feel that the traditional political parties do not speak to them any longer.

Germany now has about 2.5 million self-employed people who work on their own – freelancers and owners of small businesses without any employees. Artists, freelance programmers, tilers and hairdressers number among them. These people are not from the traditional Mittelstand of medium-sized enterprises; many of them have just enough to live on. They are neither entrepreneurs nor industrial workers, so they do not find their political home with either the conservatives or with the social democrats.

As the working world has changed, so too have family structures. There are now all shades of families, from the single working parent to more complex families with more than one father to gay couples with a child.

Different ways of working and different family groupings have given rise to a growing section of society to whom the established parties can offer no answers. The self-employed fall through the health insurance and pension nets, and battle their way every year through a taxation system that is set up either for employees with regular incomes or bigger companies with accounts departments. Lack of childcare is a problem that is as well known as it is unresolved, but flexible working – job-sharing, a four-day week or switching between working in the office and at home – continues to be a distant prospect shrouded in mist.

This is the point at which the generational conflict ignites, a conflict that many assume no longer exists just because parents and children wear the same trainers these days. While younger people are completely redefining the boundaries between work and leisure, job and family, older politicians can only see their desire to live their lives more freely as creating chaos for themselves or as an expression of need.

Traditional political parties’ unwillingness to adjust to the new ways of living and communicating is winning the Pirate Party popularity. It has the potential to become nothing less than Germany’s new liberal social-democratic party. Whether that will happen depends on how far the Pirates succeed in drawing up convincing political demands based on their core principle of freedom.

Consumer culture is best supported by markets made up of sexual clones, men who wants objects and women who want to be be objects, and the object desired ever-changing, disposable, and dictated by the market. The beautiful object of consumer pornography has a built-in obsolescence, to ensure that as few men as possible will form a bond with one woman for years or for a life-time, and to ensure that women’s dissatisfaction with themselves will grow rather than diminish over time. Emotionally unstable relationships, high divorce rates, and a large population cast out into the sexual marketplace are good for business in a consumer economy. Beauty pornography is intent on making modern sex brutal and boring and only as deep as a mirror’s mercury, anti-erotic for both men and women.

Naomi Wolf - The Beauty Myth, “Sex”, page 144. (via bprost)

Who do you sometimes compare yourself to?

I have a strict aversion to comparing myself to friends unless it is in a mutually beneficial light. I’ve seen both jealousy and self importance destroy relationships. Comparison narrows perspective. Still, I habitually compare my present self with my past and future incarnations. It is certainly not the best use of my time, but I feel compelled to do it out of a fear that my integrity has degraded.

At times, I’ve compared myself heavily to the community I am surrounded by. The process left me feeling alienated and a little insane. I do my best to refrain from doing so, now. I crave uncharted territory, but I wouldn’t wish disconnection for anyone else and thus have to live by a standard and not inflict it on myself.

Who do you sometimes compare yourself to?

the-cunt-crystal:

Why do so many boys grow out their armpit hair?

What are they trying to prove?

And the leg hair? SERIOUSLY?

(via fauvette)

(trigger warning: rape, rape jokes) Here is why I refuse to take rape jokes sitting down…

Because 6% of college-aged men, slightly over 1 in 20, will admit to raping someone in anonymous surveys, as long as the word “rape” isn’t used in the description of the act—and that’s the conservative estimate. Other sources double that number (pdf).

A lot of people accuse feminists of thinking that all men are rapists. That’s not true. But do you know who think all men are rapists?

Rapists do.

They really do. In psychological study, the profiling, the studies, it comes out again and again.

Virtually all rapists genuinely believe that all men rape, and other men just keep it hushed up better. And more, these people who really are rapists are constantly reaffirmed in their belief about the rest of mankind being rapists like them by things like rape jokes, that dismiss and normalize the idea of rape.

If one in twenty guys (or more) is a real and true rapist, and you have any amount of social activity with other guys like yourself, then it is almost a statistical certainty that one time hanging out with friends and their friends, playing Halo with a bunch of guys online, in a WoW guild, in a pick-up game of basketball, at a bar, or elsewhere, you were talking to a rapist. Not your fault. You can’t tell a rapist apart any better than anyone else can. It’s not like they announce themselves.

But, here’s the thing. It’s very likely that in some of these interactions with these guys, at some point or another, someone told a rape joke. You, decent guy that you are, understood that they didn’t mean it, and it was just a joke. And so you laughed.

Or maybe you didn’t laugh. Maybe it just wasn’t a very funny joke. So maybe you just didn’t say anything at all.

And, decent guy who would never condone rape, who would step in and stop rape if he saw it, who understands that rape is awful and wrong and bad, when you laughed? When you were silent?

That rapist who was in the group with you, that rapist thought that you were on his side. That rapist knew that you were a rapist like him. And he felt validated, and he felt he was among his comrades.

You. The rapist’s comrade.

And if that doesn’t make you feel sick to your stomach, if that doesn’t make you want to throw up, if that doesn’t disturb you or bother you or make you feel like maybe you should at least consider not participating in that kind of humor anymore, not abiding it in your presence, not greeting it with silence…

Well, maybe you aren’t as opposed to rapists as you claim.